3:2 who was faithful to him who appointed him, as also Moses was in all his house.
The writer here is quoting from Numbers 12:7, “My servant Moses is not so, who is faithful in all My house.”
The context of the quoted verse is particularly interesting and relevant to our study. Miriam and Aaron had rebelled against Moses, suggesting that they should get “equal billing” as far as the leadership of Israel was concerned, because God had spoken to them as well as to Moses. God tells them that, whilst His normal means of communicating with His prophets is through dreams and visions, He treats Moses differently. With Moses He speaks face to face, and verse 7 suggests that the reason for this is Moses’ faithfulness.
Moses’ position is based on his relationship with God. Because of that relationship, God has entrusted him with leadership within his “house” (ie the people of God.) Moses has been faithful in that leadership, discharging all his duties without wavering, and even going beyond what was required (as when he suggested that God should blot his name out of the book of life rather than destroy Israel for the sin with the golden calf – Ex 32:32). That faithfulness has led to God bringing him into an even more intimate relationship with Himself, and entrusting him with even more “state secrets.”
With that background, the writer lines up the faithfulness of Christ against the faithfulness of Moses. Moses was faithful over a small section of God’s “house” – the Nation of Israel. Christ was faithful over the far greater house, the whole of mankind and ultimately the whole of the universe. For all his faithfulness, Moses had to initially be prodded to accept the job, and a number of times stood at the point of quitting, though never actually giving up. Christ willingly embraced the Father’s plan of salvation for man and restoration of the Kingdom, and even at His darkest moment declared “not My will but Yours.” Moses was privy to some of God’s secrets – certainly more than any other prophet of his day; Christ was the Word of God, the One through whom those aspects of God’s character and works that could not be seen in the creation were revealed. Moses was willing to give his life for the people, but his life could never have been a sufficient atonement for their sin. Jesus did give His life for the world, and His life was totally sufficient. Moses had been faithful, Christ was infinitely more so.
… to him who appointed him …
Faithfulness in itself is only half the story. Faithfulness misplaced can be worse than useless. We have all heard of people who have been utterly faithful to a company – or perhaps even a church or a denomination – only to find that, when the crunch comes and the organization’s “bottom line” is better served without them, they have been dropped like a hot potato. We have known people who have been faithful to friends, family or spouses, only to find that the other party has found greener pastures on the other side of the fence. Perhaps we have even personally experienced such betrayals of our faithfulness.
On the other hand, some have faithfully laboured at a job or pursued a vision, only to find at the end of the day that they come up empty-handed, and realize that they should have been doing something else. As someone once said, there is no point in struggling to get to the top of the mountain only to get there and find that we are on the wrong mountain! It is vital that our faithfulness be to the right person, and to the right vision, or it counts for nothing.
Christ’s faithfulness was to “Him that appointed Him” – God the Father. He had come to save man, but He was not faithful to man: if He had been, He would have followed Peter’s admonition to avoid the Cross. He had come as Israel’s Messiah, but He was not faithful to Israel: if He had been, He would have obeyed all the laws of the Pharisees. His faithfulness was fixed on the Father, and on the Father’s will. Had it not been so, He could have been distracted by any of a thousand different voices, and in faithfully following them become unfaithful to the One who called Him and the task to which He was called.
This in turn meant that Christ’s faithfulness was effective, because He was faithful to the Faithful One. God the Father would never back down from His commitment to and through His Son.